Political New Feb 17th – 22nd 2025: Why it Matters

Last week was a whirlwind of political maneuvering, diplomatic shifts, and grassroots protests—all of which are setting the stage for major changes both at home and abroad. In today’s Political Jar post, we break down several of the key events that made headlines and explain why each matters.

1. Senate Approval of Budget Resolution to Fund Mass Deportations

What Happened:
In a dramatic display of partisan resolve, the U.S. Senate narrowly passed a budget resolution that allocates billions of dollars to fund the Trump administration’s hardline immigration agenda, including its controversial mass deportation plan. The vote, split almost entirely along party lines, comes as the administration argues that tighter border security and tougher immigration enforcement are essential to national security.

Why It Matters:
This move solidifies the administration’s commitment to its anti-immigration policies, potentially affecting millions of lives and the nation’s international reputation. Funding such an agenda not only deepens the domestic political divide but also signals to global audiences that the U.S. is doubling down on a confrontational approach to immigration—an issue that can have far-reaching economic, social, and diplomatic consequences.

2. Trump Denies Plans to Attend Moscow Parade with Putin

What Happened:
Amid swirling rumors and speculation, President Trump took to the public to deny reports that he was planning to attend an upcoming military parade in Moscow alongside Russian President Vladimir Putin. This clarification came after mounting pressure from critics who argued that such an appearance could be interpreted as tacit approval of Putin’s policies, especially concerning Ukraine.

Why It Matters:
By distancing himself from a high-profile joint appearance with Putin, Trump is trying to manage the optics of U.S.–Russia relations during an already tumultuous time. The denial is significant because it reflects the administration’s sensitivity to perceptions of American endorsement of Russian military posturing—a stance that could complicate efforts to forge a coherent U.S. foreign policy, particularly in relation to the ongoing conflict in Ukraine.

3. Changes in U.S. Immigration and Military Leadership

What Happened:
In a series of rapid-fire personnel shifts, the Trump administration removed its top official at Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after criticism over sluggish deportation numbers and replaced several senior military figures. These moves are seen as part of a broader strategy to tighten control over immigration and align the military leadership more closely with the president’s agenda.

Why It Matters:
Leadership changes in key agencies like ICE and the military can have a profound impact on policy implementation. These personnel moves not only reinforce the administration’s hardline stance on immigration but also raise questions about the long-term effects on operational efficiency and morale within these institutions. For many observers, the shifts underscore the administration’s willingness to sacrifice bureaucratic continuity for political messaging.

4. U.S.-Russia Summit in Saudi Arabia

What Happened:
On February 18, a high-stakes diplomatic summit took place in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, where American delegates led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Russian officials—including Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov—to explore a path toward ending the war in Ukraine. Notably, Ukrainian representatives were not invited, a decision that has sparked controversy and concern in European capitals.

Why It Matters:
This summit marks a significant pivot in U.S. foreign policy, as it hints at a willingness to negotiate directly with Russia on one of the most pressing global security issues. However, the exclusion of Ukraine not only sidelines a key stakeholder but also raises questions about the legitimacy and balance of any proposed peace deal. The meeting could reshape the diplomatic landscape in Eastern Europe and has the potential to alter alliances and power dynamics for years to come.

5. Indonesian Student Protests: The “#IndonesiaGelap” Movement

What Happened:
Across Indonesia, thousands of students took to the streets under the banner “#IndonesiaGelap” (Dark Indonesia) to protest controversial government policies—including budget cuts affecting education and a contentious free meal program. The demonstrations, which spread rapidly from Jakarta to various provinces on the islands of Java, Sumatra, and beyond, showcased a broad-based mobilization of youth and civil society demanding more accountability from their leaders.

Why It Matters:
The Indonesian protests are more than just a local political dispute—they are a barometer of public discontent in a rapidly changing society. The movement highlights the power of youth-led activism in influencing government policy and the potential for widespread mobilization to force political concessions. In an era where social media can amplify dissent almost instantaneously, these protests could set a precedent for how governments around the world handle unpopular reforms and budget cuts.

6. Early Indicators from the German Election 2025 Poll Tracker

What Happened:
Amid growing uncertainty ahead of Germany’s upcoming federal election, recent poll trackers have shown significant shifts in voter sentiment. The polls indicate that the center-right CDU–CSU coalition is projected to lead with around 30% of the vote, while the far-right AfD is expected to secure a surprisingly strong second-place showing. The findings suggest that economic woes, migration policies, and national security concerns are top priorities for voters.

Why It Matters:
Germany’s political future is crucial not only for Europe but also for global economic stability. Shifts in voter preferences could lead to significant changes in policy direction, especially in areas like economic reform, migration, and defense spending. With coalition-building becoming an increasingly complex task, these poll numbers hint at potential challenges in forming a stable government—a scenario that could have ripple effects across the European Union and beyond.

7. DC Investigation into Threats by Schumer and Garcia

What Happened:
In a development that has added fuel to the already heated political climate in Washington, D.C., the U.S. Attorney’s Office has launched an investigation into alleged “threats against public officials” made by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Representative Robert Garcia. The inquiry centers on comments reportedly aimed at high-profile figures, including members of the Supreme Court and even tech mogul Elon Musk.

Why It Matters:
This investigation underscores the deepening partisan tensions in Washington and the increasing scrutiny of political rhetoric. When elected officials are suspected of issuing veiled threats—even if in the heat of political debate—it raises serious concerns about the state of civil discourse and the potential for such language to incite further polarization. The outcome of this probe could have implications for accountability and the norms of political communication in an already fractious political environment.

Stay tuned as Political Jar keeps tracking these stories and bring you the insights that matter most. For easy access, please subscribe to our blog.